Back to 🔬 Lab-in-the-Loop at Compute Speed — Ian Quigley, Leash Bio, with Ian Quigley & RJ Honicky.
How Reproducible Are Leash Bio Binding Screens?
Ian Quigley says about 90% of chemicals that are easy in their hands still work after they are made off DNA and run in functional assays, and about 50% of the hard ones do.
For machine learning, the chemicals stay in the tube with DNA barcodes. Some bind and some do not, and the binding is signal measured from the world. Models are conditioned on the barcode, with a placeholder that marks where the DNA sits. Leash does not pretend the DNA is missing. Fresh protein batches and a new chemical library, rerun over many months, bring back the same hits in the same order for the most part. The screen is extremely reproducible and robust. Making the molecule without the DNA for a drug is where the attrition shows up. The molecule has to be made again, and sometimes it behaves differently. Not always, but sometimes.
Because the barcoded result repeats, he treats it as solid ground-truth signal and keeps training.
🔬 Lab-in-the-Loop at Compute Speed — Ian Quigley, Leash Bio ·