Does Reinforcement Learning Shrink Writing Diversity?
John Schulman says reinforcement learning has cut writing diversity a lot. Models still read as strong at writing, but across many outputs they reuse certain themes and the same character names. Human authors give a spread of styles. After reinforcement learning what comes out is one really good style. A different kind of creativity is solving hard search problems. Move 37 is an example, and so is a poem that satisfies many constraints. AI will be extremely good at that search if trained for it. Style diversity is separate. So many people are distilling from Claude that open-weight models write the same way and share the same tics, and a monoculture is emerging.
Beren Millidge does not treat the narrowness as fundamental to reinforcement learning or to distillation. Training follows the data, so data that is not broad is a problem with the data. He thinks entropy collapse comes from exploiting fairly simple verifiers when there is not a huge diversity of environments. Writing graded by a judge with specific tics lets the model reward-hack the judge, which is why the writing collapses.
AI researchers debate how close we are to recursive self-improvement ·