Full Transcript for Anthropic's IPO Filing, Elon's Talarico Obsession, and Elizabeth Holmes' Box Office Surprise

Support for this show comes from Pega. AI is full of possibilities. Enterprises run on realities. That's why Pega combines the world's most powerful AI with governance, transparency, and control enterprises demand. So you can move faster, adapt faster, and scale AI with confidence. All the power of AI, none of the uncertainty. Learn more at pega .com slash AI.

Support for this show comes from Bill. When it comes to managing money, forget the hype and look at the results. Bill has a trillion dollars of secure payments powering their BillPay tools. Instead of just moving money, Bill is powering the financial operations of nearly a half a million customers. So stop the guesswork and start scaling with the proven choice.

Ready to talk to an expert? Visit bill .com slash proven to get started and grab a $150 gift card as a thank you. Terms and conditions apply. See offer page for details.

Support for the show comes from Inside Blackstone. There's the economy you read about in the headlines, and then there's the one taking shape inside companies every day. If you're interested in the latter, listen to Inside Blackstone. It's a new podcast from Blackstone where founders, CEOs, and investors tell it to you straight. Get an inside look at the technologies transforming industries and the big trends shaping the economy.

The goal of the pod is simple, engaging conversations and make complex topics more accessible. Tune in every Tuesday and subscribe to Inside Blackstone wherever you get your podcasts.

Are you getting enough, Kara and Scott, in your life? We think not. So we're launching a newsletter for our super fans to get even closer to us and to each other. Starting this week, you can sign up to get the Pivot post delivered to your inbox. We're going to respond to your letters. Pivot fans are so smart and thoughtful, and every week we get incredibly substantive questions about business and tech news, and we don't have time to respond to it on the show.

The newsletter will be a place for us to answer those queries directly with the help of some of our expert friends. If you have a burning question about a trend in business, tech, or finance that we can help answer, send it to pivotpostatvoxmedia .com. We know you have other questions too about parenting, careers, dating, and mating. Keep sending those our way, and every now and then we'll take a break from explaining the news.

To also answer your advice questions, we cannot be held responsible for any of the outcomes if you follow Scott's suggestions for your personal life. Our first newsletter will drop next week, but you can sign up now on our new website at pivotshow .com. That's pivotshow .com. Her husband in this is quite the villain. And you get to see his penis.

Will that attract you to it? His penis is in the movie?

Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. What did you do this weekend? I'm going to tell you what I did. I went to Michigan. Did you go to a football game? I went to the parents weekend. Me and Louie and Megan and Alex went to a football game. Oh, that's nice.

We had such a good time. The Big House, it's called. And it was wonderful. We had a great weekend. I took Louie and Alex to a steakhouse. Alex ate a steak as big as your head, essentially. And we had a great time. We had a lovely family weekend. It was very nice with our son at Michigan. It was very sweet. Do you want to know what I did? Sure.

Yeah. I did the exact same thing, except at another great public university. I went to Parents' Day at our parents' weekend at UVA, first parents' weekend. And just to be serious for a moment, it's just such, and I'm sure you feel this way, but there's this quiet, unspoken of cohort of families where the kid goes off to college and right away it comes off the rails.

Like we've had friends who, for whatever reason, got upset. They didn't get into a sorority. They miss their parents. They're overwhelmed by being away from home. And it's really too bad because I think, especially among wealthy parents, the general view is the only track to being happiness and purpose and reward involves college, not recognizing that two thirds of kids don't end up with a traditional Bachelor of Arts.

And it kind of brings the whole household down. And so when you go to Parents' Weekend, as I did, and your kid is doing good academically, not great, because he's doing great socially and it's just having such a good time, you have what I describe as Parents' Weekend is like this 48 -hour exhale if it goes well. It's like our son is thriving.

Our son is making friends. Our son is learning about himself. And it's just so rewarding because you do hear stories of kids who, you know, haven't been away from home and kind of their first couple months are rough. And sometimes they leave. It can be. Yeah. I didn't have that experience with either one of my boys, but I still have two more to go.

But I just loved, I loved being there. It was so nice. Oh, it's so much fun. It's so much fun. I'm not a big football fan, but it was a really good game. It was much closer than they thought. And just being, you know what I was thinking? It sounds crazy, but I was sitting in that stadium. It was 111 ,000 people in this, in the big house. And this, it was against Indiana.

Indiana. And first of all, Indiana fans and Michigan fans got along fine. And then everyone literally was all together. I know it sounds like I'm singing. And for some reason I was like, oh, I love America. Because it was like all of us, it was such diverse crowd. It was so, everyone was getting along. Everyone was having fun. It was just like, there was no internet.

There was no Elon Musk. There was no Donald Trump. There was no noise, noise, noise, noise, noise. And it was really nice. Like it was a beautiful day. And it was, and I know I'm being like, oh, you know, whatever. But I thought it was great. We went to a, we went to a UVA football game. Let me be clear. UVA football game versus a Michigan football game is like a German PBS documentary compared to a superhero film.

I mean, no one does college football like Michigan, unless you're going to the SEC. Unless you're Indiana, which beat them. Well, yeah, but go to like, go to a Bama game. There's a big 10, my son's explaining to me. But all of a sudden it was me, my son and his mom. And all of a sudden he put his arm around us. And I'm like, oh my God, he's finally coming back.

And that wasn't it at all. They always put, they put their arms around each other and sing the Nash or the college song when they score a touchdown. And I'm like, I should have known better. I, a guy hasn't put his arm around me since he was four, but it was incredibly rewarding. And you get to speak to all these parents. I can't even imagine.

So me and my son, we get recognized a lot. I can't even imagine. Yeah, we did too. What celebrities LeBron and Irve Villachez have walking around the Michigan campus. You guys must look so ridiculous together. A lot of fans, a lot of fans. Oh my God. So if people don't know, my favorite memory of, of Alex was when Kara and her wife and Alex came down and Alex was, was young, but fully formed as in a monster.

Uh, we were watching some shitty documentary that Amanda made us watch about librarians and uproar over something, but your guests, we agree to it. And Alex came over and he sat down and I'm not exaggerating. Everyone else in the couch went up two feet in the air. We're like, whoa, he's a big man. He's a big man. I know it was great. Anyway, we have to move on, but I have to, the best part was also that Louie and Alex were together and they were doing, bro -ing it up.

And I read that. Yeah, I'm taking, I'm going to take my youngest to go see the UVA. I just, my heart was so big seeing the two of them. UNC game. Just being good brothers together. Anyway. That's nice. It was really fun. Um, anyway. What was the weather like? Gorgeous. Gorgeous. Really?

fantastic. I'm moving to Michigan now because it's not cold. You may just slow your roll. Go to a basketball game in February and take a stroll outside. I am going to go back. Anyway, we have to move on, but it was great. I do want to, at the end, talk about, have you seen this Nathan Fielder movie yet? I have no desire to see it. I'm going to talk about it at the end.

Anyway, we've got a lot to get to today, so let's dig in. There's so much. I mean, we've got the Anthropic IPO. We'll get to that in a second, but it's a busy time for elections. Let's hit those quick. Brazil's leftist president, Lula, just won re -election, though his right -wing opponent, Bolsonaro, who's the son of the previous Bolsonaro, is refusing to accept the results.

Of course, he isn't. And Serbia's longtime leader, this is a big deal, just conceded defeat to a student -led opposition movement. This was exciting. Israel is also going to the polls this week, voting over their Netanyahu gets to stay in power. It looks like he's not going to, but who knows? The other guy might not be able to form a government.

And here in the U .S., the midterms are now just one week away. Before we get to midterms, talk about what these elections,

something's coming. I don't know what it is, but it's going to be great. Well, you can read it either way. I don't know how much of a litmus test Brazil is because Brazil has compulsory voting. And also, while it looks like the populist or the more progressive is going to take the election, the son of someone incarcerated looks like they're inheriting was the equivalent of the MAGA movement.

So you could, I think, interpret that other ways. The most encouraging thing is what's come out of, is it Serbia? Serbia, Serbia, yeah. And that is, I think young people are the immune system here. I think young people are saying, look, there's a variety of things plaguing the world right now. But if you look at what's going on in France, if you look at the election results in Serbia, I think what has happened is that young people are saying, we're sick of old people voting themselves more power, more ability to engage in corruption, and voting themselves more money.

And this was a student -led electoral victory. Now, unfortunately, in America, young people don't show up to the voting polls. They get a Robin Hood account and start trading crypto. I'm not sure. I hope we see an uptick in young people voting.

That'll remain to be seen. But loosely speaking, if you had to be reductive about it, you would say that there is a pushback on corruption that is being led by young people who are fed up with not only corruption, but a lack of affordability. And also, what, for example, in France, the statistic that is just sort of, I think, rolling over the world right now in a variety of measures is the following.

In France, a third of the education budget goes to paying the pensions of retired teachers that are no longer teaching. That is just not sustainable. And I think young people have kind of, now granted, there'll be opportunists and just thugs and just people who are angry, who will join in and take advantage of it and are anarchists. And, you know, that's unacceptable.

But the kerosene waiting for matches of different flavors here is the notion that there is a corruption scandal across the world right now. And the young people feel like, okay, enough of using my credit cards that you can keep going to Mazelon. I don't know. It was really interesting. At the game, the mission game, it was all Abdul stuff, Vote Abdul.

It was not a single Mike Rogers sign anywhere, which was really interesting. And I know it's, but it's not, I can't say Michigan is as liberal as in that particular school is necessarily, but it was interesting. But you're right. I think, but I do think young people are engaged politically much more so than you think. I think you're seeing it.

I hope so. And I hope they do vote, but I think they are tired of older people sort of running the table for them. Now, it'll be interesting to see what happens in Israel. And if this government, if Netanyahu loses, if the new person can form a government. Yeah. Very difficult. Election day almost doesn't matter in Israel. It's their ability to kind of play chess, which Netanyahu has been a grandmaster of to form coalitions.

Right. And unfortunately, the way he stayed in office is by forming coalitions with very far right, ultra religious groups. I've been watching that election closely. I mean, obviously, I'm more focused on this one, but that is a really important one. Yeah. Led by students. Students. Yeah. That's really interesting. And we'll see where we're going.

We are seeing the numbers here move in, again, the Democratic direction. Let's talk about that. Former President Barack Obama is back. He hit the campaign trail this weekend, accusing Trump of bringing chaos and cruelty and corruption to the country. Nice bunch of C's. He even channeled his inner Logan Roy saying administration officials like Pete Hegseth are, quote, not serious people.

Obama then took a shot at Trump's White House makeover. Let's listen. I don't know if you've noticed, but he seems very focused on home renovations.

He should be on HGTV. Guys building a ballroom that's bigger than the White House. It's paved over the Rose Garden, put a helicopter pad on the South lawn, and there's gold everywhere. What's up with the gold?

Everything. More gold. He's got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a cheesecake factory.

You got to miss him. I got to say he is funny, but, you know, he did this for Kamala. It didn't really work, but was sort of on a roll. Meanwhile, election officials around the country are preparing for potential federal interference in the midterms. There's already cause for concern in Alaska. The Justice Department filed a lawsuit at Trump's request seeking to block certification of the Senate race.

If the Republican incumbent loses, it's because of the name. It's ridiculous. Attorney General Todd Blanche says Trump is not trying to take over a state election in any way, shape or form, which is precisely what he's trying to do. And, of course, Elon Musk is pouring even more money into the midterms. He just gave another $76 million to his PAC, bringing his total contributions to Republican groups this cycle to more than $445 million.

The PAC has spent more than $12 million attacking Texas Democratic James Tallarico, and Tallarico is pushing back against Elon. Let's listen. Elon Musk wants our land. He wants our water. He wants our taxpayer dollars. And he wants his very own personal United States senator. He is trying to buy Texas. But on November 3rd, we're going to deliver a crystal clear message to the world's first trillionaire.

Texas is not for sale. He's been using this line all over the place. So let's start with Obama. Thoughts on this? He's going all over the place. Again, he did this for Kamala. It was not effective. I think Saddam Hussein, it's as if Saddam Hussein opened a cheesecake factory. It's sort of the line of the midterms. And what Obama gets, that the rest of the Democratic Party doesn't get, is that ridicule is more powerful than indignance.

Mm -hmm. Mm -hmm. And while everyone... Or being righteous, right? Yeah, outrage. Right. And that is, you know, comedy is a strategy.

Outrage is a hobby. And he's just very powerful. He doesn't come across as mean or Trump derangement syndrome. He just ridicules the guy. We don't have anyone like him. And what he does is he creates an atmosphere where he comes in late. He is very... Few people understand brand management like the Obamas. They are very, very crude and manicured in terms of their appearances, who they associate with, when they say and when they don't say.

And they're smart to hold back until the very end. And what he does is he probably adds 10 or 15 bips to every Democrat running. And that's powerful. He's not going to save a bad candidate, but he might, he quite frankly just creates, he's another couple million gallons of water forming a wave. Now, how big, you know, again, it's the candidate more than anything, but he provides cloud cover.

And what this also means, I mean, going forward, the thing I'm most worried about is November the 4th. Yes, you and Hillary Clinton. Yeah, I really hope the Democrats don't mistake this. This isn't a blue wave, it's a red riptide. And what it comes right down to is if we take the Senate and the House, be clear, it wasn't the Democrats are back.

It's just that for this moment, the American public decided they hate Democrats less because Democrats are not polling. And if the Democrats and Speaker Jeffries don't immediately move to a series of bold proposals about affordability, restoring a progressive tax structure, taking away the anxiety that Americans feel around healthcare insecurity, more sanity around our foreign policy, specifically our tariff policy.

We're going to find out that, yeah, they had a one night stand with us, but they're not interested in having a relationship with us. Right. They've got to follow up. They will. And they also have to worry, this is something Hillary Clinton brought up last week, is let's worry about what he's going to do between now and January when they have to seat this new Congress.

He's going to try all manner of hijinks. He's already trying in Alaska. He is. But he'll continue to do so, and he'll get more and more possibly demented because he really is. With someone who covers him closely, I was like, well, maybe this will finally shut him up. And this person was like, absolutely not. It's going to get worse, worse and worse.

Yeah, but I will say this. So far, the way I see it is, when I was building, when I was renovating a home, our neighbor basically found out he didn't want construction while he was there. So he came up, he hired a lawyer and just got in the way of development and showed up to the local review board and said we were threatening the manatee population.

Anyway, just literally tried to obstruct it. But eventually, at least in Florida, eventually you get to renovate your house. And that's kind of because the law kind of weighs in and you can delay and obfuscate, but you can't change a lot. I think so far. So, for example, Cal Street has Democrats, it puts them at 76% chance of winning the seat in Alaska.

And that's Trump carried Alaska by 13 points in 24. In other words, I think all this bullshit attempt to interfere in the elections. I'm not saying it's not important. I'm not saying we shouldn't be worried about it. I'm not saying we shouldn't push back on it and have lawyers at the ready. But I do think ultimately, the person with the most votes, and this happened in 2020, that our democracy did hold.

What is unfortunate about it and what Sasha Baron Cohen was talking about, because I love the term shared lies. And what he said that really struck me and what's kind of the longer lasting thing about this is that if you were in the bubble that those January 6th rioters were in, were they really guilty? Yeah. Because they thought they were being patriots.

They did. And so, if we don't have a series of, if our leaders don't have a series of shared truths, it's becoming the Republican strategy, the Republican acceptance speech, or the Republican post -election speech, is one of two things. Either I won or it was rigged. And that just can't continue. They're going to have to. They're going to have to move on.

They really are. I do think if it's a convincing enough defeat that they will turn on Trump immediately, if not sooner. They've got to get him in the rearview mirror and move on in many ways. They can't keep holding on. By the way, he's already pretty demented these days. And with those little outbursts he has, those noises he makes, I think they've got to move him way off screen as much as they can.

That said, Elon Musk continues to pour money, and I suspect he'll do the same for the presidential to try to get J .D. Vance made president. This money is staggering, Scott. This is staggering amounts of money. I know Michael Bloomberg gave $80 million, but this is nothing like that. This is crazy. It's staggering, and at the same time, it isn't.

Because while numbers create a metric above a certain amount, the metrics begin to become very opaque, and our brain can't even wrap our head around it. So, okay, first off, $440 million, a staggering amount of money. It has an impact. It has a lower impact. The ROI is going down, and I'll come back to that. But to give you a sense for that and how until we overturn Citizens United, our democracy is going to be whittled away one cut at a time.

It just is. To give you a sense for what that means, he's a trillionaire. So, $443 million. Oh, my God, what a staggering amount of money. Okay, let's put it in relative terms. You're a millionaire. You're worth a million dollars. Okay? And if this group of politicians gets elected, it might get in the way of your car wash. And so, you'll do anything to keep this representative out of Congress because they don't like your car wash because your car wash, they have deemed, is bad for America.

And you have government contracts, and you're getting tax credits. So, all right. And your state. That's why he's so demented against Tallarico, obviously. Look, you're a millionaire. This candidate you see is an existential threat to your ability to stay a millionaire. Let's just not even go to politics. Would you be willing to spend $443 on the campaign? That's what it is to him.

$443 million to a trillionaire is $443 to a millionaire. So, for the cost of a really good dinner, if you saw huge advantage and leverage to you getting one candidate elected over the other, would you spend $443? Absolutely. So, the question is, and I now believe this, I think we should let our trillionaires cook. I want them to make a lot of money.

But on one side, you have to have campaign finance reform. And two, I do think much more progressive taxation protects us from this type of corruption. There's really nothing good from someone becoming a trillionaire. And people will say, well, he's smarter than us on business, granted, or most people on business. And he deploys capital in incredible ways that benefit the economy.

I'm not suggesting he shouldn't be able to invest it and take the capex write -off. I don't want to decrease his genius or his investment. What I'm suggesting is when he decides to take the money and recognize that gain and do things such as spend it on a boat or spend it on a political campaign, which is not tax deductible, before he does that, it should be taxed at a minimum AMT of 40%.

And possibly more than that. Okay. I agree. Okay. Okay. Shut the fuck up. No, this is something you've been saying. I can't believe that the Democrats, this is something Democrats could win on. They've had enough money. They have enough money and they're now fucking with us. And I think it really is, it is coalescing people, the amount of money he's giving.

You know, he's sort of become the Bond villain of our country. And I think especially with Tallarico, the obsession, the obsessive, you know, he doesn't even have Natalie Harp to write those for him. And, and just like on and on and on. There were like 20 of them in a row in one evening, late into the evening. And the reason he, of course, is going for Tallarico is because all his stuff is he moved to Texas to get away from people.

By the way, California helped him a lot. But they just,

and Scott Galloway, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode, Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode

Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Recode Rec

and the show. Support for the show comes from Harvey AI. It starts with a handshake to people find common ground and shake on it. A word becomes an agreement, an agreement becomes a contract, a contract becomes bound by law. For centuries, law has made our promises durable. Agreements are how we live side by side, settle our differences, build businesses, and move forward together.

Today, Harvey, the AI platform designed specifically for legal work, is writing the next chapter of that legacy, helping lawyers handle those agreements more effectively and bring their expertise to more of the legal work. people. Harvey is trusted by more than 3 ,000 customers across 70 countries. More than 200 ,000 lawyers, 80% of the AMLA 100, and 20% of the Fortune 500 are all building with Harvey.

They're accelerating review, sharpening negotiations, uncovering insights, drafting first responses, and more. And they're doing it all in one secure place built for legal teams. This is how the future of agreements is being crafted now. Learn more at Harvey .ai. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Users should always independently review and verify any output from Harvey.

Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice.

Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Harvey does not provide legal advice. Obviously, Anthropic has committed more than $600 billion to future cloud computing deals.

Five of the company's customers accounted for about a quarter of its revenue for the first nine months of the year. Ninety -four pages of filing are spent on risk factors with the company warning investors about rogue AI models in the opposition to data centers. Anthropics co -founders, including CEO Dario Amadei, would retain a combined 50 .1% of voting power.

The company hasn't yet revealed how much it plans to raise or its offering price. It's a really interesting situation. And by the way, at the very same time they're doing this, Elon is trashing data centers because, of course, he's in the data center business and he's trying to kill all the other neo -club businesses. But talk a little bit on Anthropic.

Look, it's staggering. It may be the fastest -scaling software company. It is the fastest -scaling software company in history. So effectively, let's just talk a little bit about the numbers. So what it shows is, okay, revenue in 2024 was $386 million. In 2025, it was $4 .5 billion. So up 12x. And so far this year, in the first half, it's clocked 16.

So call it an annual rate of 40. So it's 10xing in 26.

So it basically 14xed its revenue from the first half of last year. I've been trying to sort through the numbers. They called it a net loss of $81 billion. Ignore that because $72 billion of that loss was the accounting loss you have to take when you take a convertible bond and convert it to equity. Yes, explain that. They borrowed money and then they turned it to equity.

So an incredible innovation in the debt markets is something called a convertible bond where you pay them kind of a below -market interest rate, but you have the opportunity to convert your debt into equity if the equity goes up. And so it's a chance to kind of have the downside protection of a bond. The company gets cheap capital, which it can pay back in cheap equity if the stock goes up.

It's kind of a great innovation. But when a debt converts to equity, which is kind of a good thing for everybody, shareholders get a little bit of dilution, but you take the debt off the balance sheet. You no longer owe that money. And then debtors get to participate in that sweet, sweet returns of a growth company. But if you, when it converts, you have to take that as an accounting loss.

The actual conversion from debt to equity, if it's a billion dollars in convertible debt that converts to equity, you have to recognize that billion dollars as a quote unquote accounting loss. So the numbers I've sussed out is basically it did 25 billion and lost nine. But if it's growing four or five X at high margins, it should be able to get to profitability.

Now they've done a bunch of like, you know, hocus pocus to try and show that they're sort of profitable. I hate this fucking adjusted EBITDA shit. So for example, what Anthropic does and OpenAI doesn't to their credit, Anthropic books the full revenue of a token sale, whereas OpenAI only takes the 20% that they recognize because the rest goes to the neoclouds and stuff like that.

There's just no getting around it. This company is scaling unbelievably fast. This is anecdotal evidence, but quite frankly, their permissions from I get from Claude Cowork have probably, in my opinion, been the greatest innovation for me in terms of a change in my life since Uber. So let me ask you, what's the problem? What are you worried about? Like the B2B? Oh, there's tons of risk here.

Besides AI Rogue, obviously. Okay, first off. Government? Government regulation? If the government can't come up with some sort of regulatory policy that lets these guys understand the rules by which they're playing by and gives the public some type of certainty for what is going on here and not going on here. The IRGC figures out a way to just hack a light signal at a busy intersection and then blames it and then spins up their bots and blames it on AI.

States are going to start banning AI models. People are scared of this shit right now, and people don't trust it. 75% of Chinese trust AI, only 25% of Americans. There's an existential risk. Americans hate it. It's not just not like it. They hate it. The terms are very, you know, it's really interesting to see the attitudes. Everyone was saying that the scarcity was around chips.

It's not. It's electrons. It looks like it's power. There is huge risk around the levels of capex they have to make. And if these things don't keep 10xing, all of a sudden those, I added up Anthropics commitments to 400 billion. People are saying it's 600 to 800. I don't know how they got to that math. But regardless, unless they keep 10xing, which they are doing right now, someone's going to go, oh, the math doesn't work.

And then competitive risk. NVIDIA is talking about taking their GPUs and putting them directly on a client, a phone, which quite frankly might leapfrog LLMs. And then you have Meta with its own LLM that is free, that is number one in the app store, that has a direct relationship with half a billion businesses and 3 billion consumers. There are threats everywhere.

But the reason there are threats everywhere is this is a blue whale that, and there are orcas everywhere thinking, how do we take this thing down? But the blue whale is 10xing right now. Yeah, it's interesting. This is like, it's the Google essentially is how I think of it. Like, is it the Google versus anything else? And where will it go? And I think the issues are, what will happen to the OpenAI IPO post this depends on what it does at the same time.

If it doesn't have as impressive a bottom line here, they're going to have a real problem. And then what do the big companies do? What does a Microsoft do? What is a, what are the rest of them do? Because there is a precariousness that I think Elon was pointing out, which is all these NeoCloud businesses are going to go belly. I call them guppy, guppy level extinction or something.

I forget something with guppies. But, but, and he's talking his own book because he sells compute himself. It's, that's how he's making money. He's not making money in people using it as much as it is renting out his space. And so it's important to him for these things to happen. It's all sort of, it feels a little Jenga like some of this.

There were, it's like a lot of circular deals, but let me just, I'll go back. Consumers are using it. Consumers are using plot. Well, let's talk about those numbers. Yeah. It's, I hate this, but it's a justed measure. It made 1 .6 billion in operating income and a half. It's a 10% margin. In a year earlier, the margin was negative 159. Let's see what happens when they actually start accounting for it in a, in a rational, mature way.

But I still think the growth, growth kind of cures all problems. Computing infrastructure costs were 9 billion in the first half. That's already more than the 7 .3 billion it's been in all of 2025. But still you can't get around the fact that Anthropics revenue growth and efficiency has been incredibly impressive. Get this, get this stat.

Revenue per employee is about 6 .6 million. That's up from 1 .4 million a year earlier. So the efficiency here is remarkable. By the way, that's greater revenue per employee than every Mag7 member except NVIDIA. And it'll probably surpass NVIDIA's revenue per employee. So well run. This is a well run company, much better run. They don't have that.

I mean, this is the nightmare. This is the nightmare for politicians and for citizens and for college grads and the dream for shareholders. They don't employ that many people.

And their, their revenue is up 1400%. Their employee count wasn't up 1400%. They didn't 15X their employee base. And this is what is so, I just can't get over. This is how every board meeting in a growth company works. The CEO comes in and says, we're going to grow revenues 12% next year, 14% next year. That's like a modest growth company.

Add a head count of, yeah. Which means I need permission to hire another 8% employees or increase my employee base, 8% or 10%, which will increase earnings 15 to 20% next year. And we go right at it. Have at it brother.

Meta two years ago or six earnings calls ago said, oh, we increased revenue by 23% and we did it with 20% fewer employees. That should have said shut. That literally all of a sudden, and no one likes to talk about this. If you use the term AI in a board meeting, they expect the next sentence to be, I'm going to do more with less. And when I say more, I mean more revenues and less employees.

And this is what, this is what Anthropoc is showing. Yeah. A hundred percent. It'll be, okay. Last question. So we've got to move on to this. What is the valuation in November when it goes public? Well, it'll be looking at, I'm trying to think what their 27 projected numbers will be. If they're first half, if they're at a run rate of 40,

I think it goes out at 2 trillion because I'm just, my Greek lands are going here. If it, if it's doing 40 this year and they think they can not 10 X it, but 5 X, that's 200 billion on 2 trillion. That's 10 X for 12 months rate. I mean, that looks cheap compared to SpaceX and some of these other guys. Yeah. And let me say for everyone, it's coming after the election.

The Democrats just got a lot of new donors because this is not a, this is not a MAGA group of people. Let's just say it's, it'll be interesting to see where they deploy their political capital when going forward. And speaking of how you deploy your capital, Elon Musk is finally admitting that SpaceX restricted Ukraine's access to Starlink.

You think? This is what Scott and I said he did. He's claiming Ukraine violated Starlink's terms of service by using it for offensive drone strikes to kill people, which Ukraine disputes. But Elon also said StarShield is a different system controlled by the U S government and what they decide to do is up to them. That's again, a bunch of lying.

Ukraine says Starlink and StarShield are now operating at normal speeds after more than a week of disruptions that impacted military operations and led to the deaths of people in Ukraine. That incident, again, reminded people how much power this guy has and will, and, and whether they'll do anything, anything at all about keeping him in check.

I'll also note Musk also reportedly invested about $1 billion in David Ellison's Skydance. They need the money, but guess what, Scott? I'm leaving. Sorry. I just had to say that because I know you like it. Um, though they're trying to get me to stay again. They're trying to get me to stay. I'm telling you, they're trying to get me to stay.

It's all economic. The costs of you leaving are minimal because you make a lot of money on a podcast with a jarhead. I get it. I'm just telling you, I was surprised because I keep yelling. I'm surprised too. I'm surprised they want you to stay. I know. I don't know why I don't, maybe David doesn't know, but this, this, this, this, we can make very quick.

Look, we said he was lying about it. He was lying about it. He is in a position to influence battlefield decisions and he shouldn't be. Trump seems to be out of it or lying. Either one, not good. Neither choice is good. Um, and Hegseth doesn't seem to be anywhere here. Should be the one having decision making power here. Who knows? And, uh, uh, un, unaccountable trillionaires should not be making these decisions.

I don't know how else to say anything, anything to add? Uh, I, you know, I'm very excised about this, so I want to talk about it, but I just, just briefly want to return to Anthropic for a moment. Just in the risks, uh, section of the S1, I just want to highlight some of my favorite things. Open quote, uh, advanced AI could pose catastrophic or existential risk to humanity.

That's my favorite. Our AI models may behave in unintended, misaligned or autonomous ways. They could blow us up.

Capabilities may advance more rapidly than our ability to develop, validate and implement safety measures. OK, that means your product shouldn't be out in the public, folks.

Anyways, so Musk. Speaking of an unguided missile. I'm shocked he's not spending more because I can't imagine the first person that's going to be hauled in front of Congress on November the 4th is Elon Musk. And for all of his lawyers, he's not going to be able to to avoid that for very long, because imagine Charles Lindbergh, a hero, an innovator, an idol.

He was on the side, to be fair, as a lot of Americans were. And they said in World War One, it wasn't worth it. The juice wasn't worth the squeeze for us. That's their problem. Now they want us to send our young men back. Let's partner with Hitler. He's not that bad.

Imagine if Lindbergh had purchased McDonnell Douglas and he could have raised the money, which at the time was the premier aircraft manufacturer. And then it was converted for military use. There was a there was a military business version of McDonnell Douglas and FDR started started converting DC threes into bombers and giving them to Churchill to try and stave off fascism.

But there was a guidance system on these these DC threes. And what if Charles Lindbergh had the ability to remotely turn off the guidance systems and all of a sudden London was burning because they didn't have the ability to deploy their defensive bombers? That has happened here. What what would they have done in the middle of the last century if they found out that a private citizen was purposefully throttling back the defense capabilities of who the American public supports and considers an ally in the defense of a murderous autocrat? So this is nothing short of, in my opinion, and I've used this term, if what went down here or what was alleged to go down here went down

here and unilaterally Elon Musk decided to throttle back Starshield slash Starlink such that they could not launch defensive drones. And our ally has been weakened strategically and there has been civilian deaths. Then in sum, he is a traitor to the West and our government is at fault for not putting in place guardrails such that one person who is not elected can have that type of power over history.

Why do you think he admitted it this week after lying about it essentially? I think he's going to have to go before Congress. And I think his lawyers I think his lawyer said, no, no, no, no, no. Stop tweeting that you didn't have anything to do with it. You're going to have to go in front of Congress and either say I lied or lie again and you don't want to lie in front of Congress.

So come out of the closet now. There's a ton of noise. This is a huge story. This would be the biggest scandal of any decade if it happened in any other decade. Right. Yeah, I agree. But they're like, there's a ton of noise, midterms. Just put it out now. Just put it out. You throttled it back. Say you were confused or you didn't know or you don't like, whatever it is.

Take your medicine now because you are going to be hauled in front of Congress. Yep, they are. That is something. And it's, by the way, it's bipartisan. There's Republicans speaking about this. There's not. It is not just the Democrats gunning for him. It is every. It's lots of people. And I think. And by the way, it's global to FYI. And he's starting to see problems in Canada and Europe.

And he's fighting with India. This man can't. He's literally. This is not going to end well. Any of this for him. But, you know, he's got a lot of money. He's going to keep spending it. All right. Enough of Elon. Let's go on a quick break. When we come back, audiences are flocking to that new Elizabeth Holmes documentary.

Support for the show comes from Gusto. Nothing is more relatable than postponing that one tedious task plaguing your to -do list. For a lot of business owners, that's probably payroll. Gusto is here to take it entirely off your plate. Gusto is online payroll and benefits software built for small businesses. It's all -in -one, remote -friendly, and incredibly easy to use.

So you can pay, hire, onboard, and support your team from anywhere. Automatic payroll tax filing, simple direct deposits, health benefits, commuter benefits, workers' comp, 401k, you name it. Gusto makes it simple. They have options for nearly every budget. You get unlimited payroll runs for one monthly price. No hidden fees. No surprises.

They've got plenty of built -in automated tools designed to help you save time, like offer letters, onboarding docs, direct deposit, and more. It's quick and simple to switch to Gusto. Just transfer your existing data to get up and running fast. Plus, you don't pay a cent until you run your first payroll. Try Gusto today at gusto .com slash pivot and get three months free when you run your first payroll.

That's three months of free payroll at gusto .com slash pivot. One more time, gusto .com slash pivot.

Support for this show comes from Shopify. If you have a great idea for business, don't let another year go by without acting on it. Shopify can get you up and running fast. If you move quickly, you could even have your business launched in time to take advantage of Black Friday. Shopify helps launch a store and start selling in a few simple steps without needing to be an e -commerce expert.

And sidekick, Shopify's AI assistant can help with business tasks along the way from store setup to planning promotions. Shopify's pre -built themes and AI site builder can make it easier to create a professional storefront. And Shopify's mobile app lets you manage key parts of your store from anywhere, including inventory, customer support, and payments.

Shopify powers millions of businesses worldwide, from household names to small businesses just getting started. Launch before Black Friday, a time of year when more people are already shopping and ready to buy. If you're ready to launch your business for Black Friday, go to Shopify .com slash pivot to start your free trial. That's Shopify .com slash pivot.

Go to Shopify .com slash pivot today to hear your first.

Support for this show comes from NPR's Machine Gods podcast. AI news comes at you nonstop, but what does any of it actually mean for you? Machine Gods from NPR helps you make sense of it. It's hosted by my friends Kevin Roos and Casey Newton, two of the best tech journalists on the beat. Well, except for like me. They give you unmatched access to the industry and they're fun to listen to, too.

Casey and Kevin take an AI realism approach. They report on AI as it is. They don't cheerily for it or panic about it. The show explores what AI means for work, for life, and for all our futures. Weekly episodes mix interviews and industry news analysis so you can be in the know from all the angles. And you don't need to be an AI expert to listen to Machine Gods.

It's made for smart, curious people who want to understand what's happening without the hype. Because regardless of how you feel about AI, we can all agree it's important to keep yourself informed and you might as well be entertained while you're at it. That's exactly what Casey and Kevin are committed to doing. Listen now to Machine Gods in the NPR app wherever you choose your podcasts.

And Kevin and Casey, thanks for the money. I'll spend it well.

Scott, we're back. A nearly three -hour documentary about disgraced Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes gave a comic book movie a run for its money this weekend. You Can See Everything, directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, was the second highest -grossing movie at the box office just behind Clayface. The film has now made $45 million in two weeks, the biggest debut for a non -musical documentary since Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9 -11 in 2004.

I have some thoughts. I liked parts of it. I didn't like other parts. He's full of trickery. This is what he's known for. I put something out that I said, one, Amanda Seyfried is the best thing ever in this movie. She deserves an Oscar. Secondly, Elizabeth Holmes reminds me of every tech person I've ever met, constantly denying accountability, what we just talked about, denying accountability, lying through her teeth, committing all manner of criming and acting as if she's the victim.

She is sort of the distillation of every single bad tech person I've met. And by the way, she maybe shouldn't be in jail compared to them. She absolutely should be in jail, but maybe they should be too. But you can have that. That's a separate debate. It's a really interesting movie. I suspect there's a lot there. I think he's playing with them.

He's well known for that. He's pretending he's on their side a little bit. Who knows where he is because he's such an interesting filmmaker. I don't usually like his stuff, but I tell you, it is riveting. And it's really interesting about identity and lying and truth in this society. So that's what I have to say about that. But the fact that it's making so much money, Scott, I mean, people are sitting through.

This is a three hour movie. This is not a short movie. My showing last night was packed at an Alamo Draft House in Crystal City, Virginia. That's how I wasn't able to get tickets except for there. And I barely got those. Alamo White House at Crystal City, Virginia. In case anyone forgot, you're whiter than a snowflake. Well, it's the only place I can get tickets.

It was crazy. I love Alamo Draft House. But it's really popular. I know. We had a good time. I'm bored. Bring me a beer. Bring me some sliders. It's the dark, so I can't see what I'm eating. Bring me some of those. I love ordering cuisine in a movie theater. Then you know you're in for some fine dining. It was actually not bad. Nonetheless, this is interesting that people are sitting through in a theater.

The theater stuff is going really well for it. And I think that in and of itself is an interesting phenomena. Any thoughts on why? I don't want to see the movie. But it's, as you said, second biggest opening ever for a documentary behind Fahrenheit 9 -1 -1 in 2004. And per theater, it's outperforming Clayface, which probably spent 10 times that.

Clayface. Which is supposed to be good. Yeah, it costs $40 million to make. This costs $7 million to make. It's great to see. I'm super excited. The documentary, I'm super excited to see. I want to see the documentary on the guy who skied down Everest. I think it's called Everest. That looks really cool. But it's nice to see documentaries having their time in the sun.

The only thing I'm sure of about this. So I've told you. It's not easy to feel sorry for Elizabeth Holmes. But it struck me that the only reason she's in jail is because her board got very, very angry and felt like they were taken. She took a lot of money from a lot of rich white guys. The rich, powerful white guys. Yeah. Anyways, the only thing I'm certain of is what her punishment should be.

Her punishment should be a staring contest with Cash Patel. And I think both their heads would blow up. Oh, that's funny. She's been sucking up to Trump and trying to get out a pardon. By the way, that's the humor. I think his name is Josh Johnson. I need to start crediting these communities. You need to credit people.

I'll tell you this. It's not a documentary exactly. It's something else. It's drama. The music is used. It feels like a thriller. It feels like a movie. And by the way, by the end, it's not clear what you saw. So it's not the documentary in the traditional sense of that. You know, it's laying out a case. It's something. It's a mindfuck of a, I'd say it's a movie.

And it's, you have to see it that way versus anything else. And for everyone online who says to me, don't you understand Nathan Fielder? He's fucking with you. I do understand it, people. I understand his genre. I think he's a very talented filmmaker. I would recommend seeing it, Scott, if I were you. I think you would enjoy it because it's a movie, not a documentary.

I find her and the sociopathy she represents just uncomfortable. And my sense is all of these men have just become such fucking idiots in her gaze. All these older men she seduced to invest or be her boyfriend. Her husband in this is quite the villain. And you get to see his penis. Will that attract you to it? Well, that depends. Yes, exactly.

It's weird. It's a weird color, I have to say. It's rather large, but it's a weird color. His penis is in the movie? Yes. He's, they somehow, I don't, I don't understand why it's there, but there it is. There it is. I think you would like it. I have to say, it's not a documentary in the traditional sense. It is something else. I just don't, I just, I also get who she is because she's just like a lot of the people I've covered, which is without accountability, completely acting like a victim and a stone cold liar.

And that is what I, that I did walk away from it. Do you think she deserved a 10 year prison sentence? Probably not. Agreed. Like, I don't know. But nonetheless, I think she's guilty, guilty, guilty. Yeah. I think she's guilty too. True. And, and, and, and, and, and listen to like Tyler Schultz and others who went out on a limb and John Kerry Rue.

She's a grifter. And so is her husband is a massive grifter. And I have to, I want to see it again because I want to see if I think that Nathan Fielder has been tricked by them or he tricks them by pretending to be tricked by them. It's, it's, it's a very much an origami of a movie and you should see it. But Amanda S is fantastic. That's why you should go, Scott.

I love Amanda S. Let me tell you. You are going to be like, not just that. She is a great person. She's a great, she, she, she is part of this movie and reenactments and stuff like that. And let me say, she, she starred in the Hulu series about Theranos, if you meant the dropout, if you remember. It's like really scan my emotions. I think the reason I don't want to see it is I'm traumatized looking at her and the way she talks.

She looks at people the same way my ex looked at me when I ordered fries after she said she wasn't hungry. Oh, that's funny. That's not that funny. You're not laughing. It's a little funny. It's a little funny. You know what she does a lot? And I, is a trick is whenever she's talking to you, she shakes her head. She's like a car salesman.

She looks, she looks like my youngest when his mother asks if he remembered to take the chicken out of the refrigerator. She looks, he looks at her like, why would I deceive you? Of course I did. I know it's still in the refrigerator. She just freaks me out. I don't, I do not want to become a tractor beam into her gaze. I, I just want to see the Amanda Seyfried parts.

It's worth it for Amanda Seyfried. That's it. And it's not about Elizabeth Holmes. It's about Amanda Seyfried and the crazy ex -husband. I mean, husband, not ex -husband. He's her husband. Yeah. Yeah. No, he's, he's reached out to me a couple of times. What did he reach out to you about? Um, nothing, nothing untoward. He, he heard my comment.

I, I, I'm, I've made comments several times that it, I get a man, not a man. I get that Elizabeth Holmes is not a sympathetic character, but it just struck me that what, there, there's been the, the line between fake until you make it and fraud is getting increasingly blurred in Silicon Valley. And it just didn't sit with me that they seem to have absolute, the public, the media and court seem to have no problem putting away someone for 10 years.

And she just happened to have ovaries. I just, to me, it just struck like, okay, one of these things is not like the other. And that when, that a lot of the male founders who I think have done very similar acts of fraud, they seem to get lower prison sentences. Now, having said that, someone would come back, what did her partner get? The guy, he got the same? He got more.

He got more. Well, okay. So that directly contradicts what I'm saying. But anyways, I have said, I have shown some, I don't call it empathy, but I have, I have talked consistently about there's something that doesn't sit right with me about her sentencing. Now, so he reached out to me and said, basically, I appreciate your kind words. Would you like to get involved? Would you be interested in getting involved in a movement to try and get her out early? And I'm not.

You know, I think that the courts have made her. Maybe looking for money. They're trying to revive Theranos 2 .0. No, I don't think he was going, he was coming at me for money. I think he, I think he generally wants to get the mother of his children out of, out of prison as soon as possible. Or that's the sense I got, but it was, it was, it was a very, very minor email exchange.

Yeah. Well, stay away. Go see this movie. Well, I don't know. I wouldn't mind hanging out with him and providing some comfort to his friend, Amanda. She must be quite upset about all this. She's not his friend. Anyway, one more quick break. We'll be back for Wins and Fails.

Hi, it's Phoebe Judge, host of Criminal. I'm going on tour. If you like hearing me tell stories about people, well, I've decided to tell stories about my life and the people I love. A letter was left carelessly around, so I was sort of caught red -handed. It's a show about secrets and forgiveness. I hope you'll come see it. Find all our tour dates and get tickets at thisiscriminal .com slash live.

Hi, everyone. This is Kara Swisher. And I'm Scott Galloway. And we want to tell you about Pivot, our twice -weekly podcast. That's right, Kara. What a thrill. It's a chance for us to break down all the big things happening in tech, business, and politics. Yes, and I keep you in check so people can make it through each episode, whether it's digging into constant changes in the world of AI and social media or trying to keep up with whatever the fuck Elon is doing.

We're here to give you our take on all of that. Every Tuesday and Friday morning, we drop a new episode about some of the major stories of the moment. And Scott is a prediction machine gazing into his crystal ball to tell you about where it's all heading. That's right. So if that sounds like a good time for you, especially Mr. That's Right, you can follow us on your favorite podcast app to get new episodes every week.

Boom. How will Israel's upcoming elections shape its relationship with the United States? The most probable scenario is not going to be a clear winner, and therefore there will be another election. And Trump's Middle East agenda is going to be pretty much hijacked by the political crisis in Israel. I'm John Feiner. And I'm Jake Sullivan. We're the hosts of The Long Game, a weekly national security podcast.

This week, we speak with Barack Ravid, global affairs correspondent for Axios. He explains the stakes of the elections for Israel and the world. The episode is out now. Search for and follow The Long Game wherever you get your podcasts.

Okay, Scott, let's hear some wins and fails. Would you like to go first? So my win is just in terms of media. I watched something called, and I haven't seen a war movie that I didn't like. There's a new war movie out, screenplay and directed by Peter Berg, who's I think a great artist or a great filmmaker. It's from Imagine Entertainment called The Mosquito Bowl.

And it's an American war sports drama. And it's basically, it's based on the 2022 Buzz Bissinger book, The Mosquito Bowl, A Game of Life and Death in World War II. It's about a game played during World War II. And it's essentially these four top American football players were enlisted in the United States Marine Corps after the attacks on Pearl Harbor while preparing for the Battle of Okinawa.

And most World War II movies are about the European theater. And this just shows just the brutality and cost of war. It's well done. These things are very hard. It's very hard to recreate battle scenes and do it well. I don't think anyone's done it as well as Steven Spielberg did in terms of his depiction of the landing on Omaha. But this comes pretty close.

And it's also, Berg and Grazer also collaborated on Friday Night Lights, which was another great sports film. Anyways, I think war movies are really a really good reminder for people like me who have a tendency to be a bit more war hawkish of just the real costs that we outsource.

Mostly, not all, but mostly in terms of combat to young men. Because the reality is young men are disposable anthropologically. Typically, if you have a village of 100 people and 40 of the men die, the village survives. If 40 of the women die, the village goes out of business. So especially in a society where young people don't have as much opportunity, we find wars for them.

I don't think that's true with America in most instances. But you just see the brutality of war up close. And they do a good job. It is a very difficult thing to recreate. Anyways, my win is the movie The Mosquito Bolt. I really enjoyed it. My loss is very straightforward. If a general of NATO was found out that he was somehow involved in the scaling up or scaling down of Starlink or Starshield, and we found out that that individual had throttled back, a private citizen or someone in the military had throttled back the capabilities of Starlink,

what would we do? And why is it any different from Elon Musk? If the CEO of Boeing figured out a way to inhibit the defense mechanisms and defense? If the head of Northrop Grumman, if we found out the CEO had throttled back the guidance systems on our nuclear submarines, what would we do to that CEO? How is this any different? We have normalized the standard of behavior and given the mother of all dangerous hall passes to people because they are billionaires.

And this cannot continue. And if he got permission from the president, then the president needs to be held accountable. But the CEO of Boeing is not allowed to throttle back military aircraft mid -flight defending our allies. And that is exactly what happened here or appears to have happened. So I'm super excited. I'm hoping there's going to be a blue wave.

I've been bringing on candidates. The vibes are pretty good. But on November the 4th, these candidates have to do a couple of things. It's about affordability and it's about accountability. And I don't. First off, when I say accountability, for God's sakes, please don't try and impeach the president. Please don't. But but absolutely, in terms of corruption, haul people in front of Congress.

And we're going to see a lot of names we've been talking about over the last few years who are under the impression that they're immune from all this shit. But absolutely, my fail here is America has normalized a private citizen becoming the most powerful person in terms of military technology and potentially the fate of the West. Haul this person in front of Congress.

Haul him. Bring him in on a dolly. All right. My win. You know, I was traveling a lot in the last couple of days, and I ended up watching Nobody Wants This. And I didn't love last season. It's in its third season now. I thought it was kind of silly. I liked it at the beginning. It's on Netflix. I think this season is wonderful. Nobody Wants This? Yeah.

And it's not because of the main couple, which is Adam Brody and Kristen Bell, who are perfectly fine. He's a rabbi. She's a goyess. They're never going to get together. Nobody wants this. And it's a very solid comedy, stuff like that. But there are two characters in this. Justine, I think it's Lupe, or Lupe, who plays Morgan. And Timothy Simons, or Simmons, I think Simons, plays Sasha.

Sasha, they're the brother of the man and the sister of the main character, woman, have the most beautiful relationship. He's from Veep. He played the really tall guy, the obnoxious guy on Veep. He's supposed to be a wonderful man also. Oh, he's amazing, this guy. He's hilarious in Veep. He was on, what did he play, what was the name of the character he played on Veep? Jonah.

He played Jonah, Jonah on Veep. He was amazing. She played the wife of the dumb brother, who was, I think, a prostitute on Succession, and she was great there. The two of them together are one of the most lovely friendships, I suspect is moving, I haven't watched the whole thing, to romance. But the way they interact as a man and a woman, it's really refreshing, and I think they're just the most lovely pairing.

I'm sorry if mispronounce their names. My fail has got to be the executives now trying to suck up to Democrats. I am getting a lot of incoming from companies now. I think they're suddenly very worried about what's about to happen. And they're worried about looking like assholes for sucking up to Trump, really, pretty much. And so they're making all these moves.

I find that great. I've just been invited to four different company parties, tech company parties, which did not happen in the last six months. Interestingly, someone who has gotten in a bit of trouble, Bill Maher, went to the White House again for dinner. It's fine if he wants to go to the White House, whatever. But Trump then posted his longest true social post ever, a 1300 word diatribe against Bill Maher.

Dinner might not have been great. He just got criticized for going. He's getting criticized by Trump. You're going to see a lot of this kind of stuff going forward is people being angry because you were canoodling with the president. So it's a fail. I didn't want them then and I want them now. So it's going to be interesting to see them trying to reenter society if he loses as badly as people think he will.

Anyway, we'll see where it happens. So just going to the Jonad files, and that is, Jonah was probably the subject or the receptacle for some of the best insults. He was called the cloud botherer, guy scraper, the pointless giant, the wrong shape, human scaffolding, the world's biggest single cell organism. I'd still think, next to Modern Family, I think Veep was the best written show on television.

It was. As you have been in my house more times than I have, I don't like stuff. I have no kids. I have no people. I don't like, you know, I have yogurt, champagne, and, you know. Very expensive champagne. A few pre -rolled and that's it. One, and I get all this tchotchke shit that I throw out immediately. I decorate my house like a Swiss architect who's, you know, got ADD.

Anyways, the one thing I have in my room, and it's the first, almost the first thing I see, I wake up every morning, is Tammy Haddad sent me a Veep pillow, and it's Mount Rushmore with Julie Louis -Dreyfus's face on it. And I wake up, and it just makes me smile. Yeah, she's the best. I love. That show is the best. Whenever I'm a little bit down, I turn to drugs.

No, I turn to Veep, or sometimes I watch Curb Your Enthusiasm or Modern Family if I'm feeling like I want to cry. Yeah. Yeah. Anyway, she's in a play in New York by the way with Allison Janney, who's also spectacular in The Diplomat. Julia Louis -Dreyfus? Yeah, they're in the thing together. Why doesn't she come to one of our live pivots? I think she's busy being on Broadway, Scott, I believe.

I'll text her. Broadway schmodway. All right, I will text her. Nobody sees Broadway. I will text her. She's a shy and retiring person. She's great. I've spent a little time with her. I really like her. Anyway, we want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business tech or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag .com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855 -51 -PIVOT.

Okay, that's the show. Thanks for listening to Pivot. Be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We'll be back on Friday. Today's show was produced by Lara Neiman, Zoe Marcus, Taylor Griffin, and Dodd Wiseman are in your side. Entered in this episode. Thanks also to Jubros, Miss Rivera, and Dan Chalon. Mishar Crow as Fox Media's executive producer of podcast.

Make sure to follow Pivot on your favorite podcast platform. Thanks for listening to Pivot from Fox Media. We'll be back later this week for another breakdown of all things tech and business. Kara, go blue.