Full Transcript for The couples therapists who nearly got divorced | Harville Hendrix

In 1999, a million couples applied for and got divorces. What made us different from that is that when we were on our way to the divorce court, we were among the most visible couples therapists in the world.

Thanks to Oprah Winfrey. You're listening to TED Talks Daily, where we bring you new ideas to spark your curiosity every day. I'm your host, Elise Hu. And who you just heard there was today's speaker, relationship therapist, Harville Hendrix. For about a decade, he and his wife, Helen La Kelly Hunt, appeared on Oprah at least once a year to talk about getting the love you want.

And couples everywhere were using their method for transforming conflict into healing and growth. There was just one problem. Their own marriage was falling apart. A lot of the trouble came down to something most of us are probably doing. The ordinary conversations is what we all do. They're called parallel monologues. And that in which you talk and the other person talks and you're trying to control the narrative or you're waiting for the other person to stop so you can refute their commitment to their absolute truth.

In this talk, Harville shares what happened when he and Helen gave themselves one year to turn things around. He's candid about how slowly it went, including a less than flattering diagnosis from a fellow therapist, and about the moment they realized the problem wasn't any one fight, but the way they had come to see each other. We decided we would change the perception of each other from a resource into a blessing or a gift, and that we would base that on the fact that each of us were creatures of nature, that each of us had intrinsic value, and that we were valuable because we existed, and that we would honor that value because we existed.

Harville makes the case that the kind of listening that saved his marriage works far beyond couples, in families, workplaces, even whole communities. That's coming up right after a short break.

This episode is brought to you by Walmart Business. The best leaders might tell you the work that moves an organization forward doesn't happen in spreadsheets or supply chain emails. It happens when you have the space to think big. That's the idea behind Walmart Business. It's built to take the friction out of running an organization so your team isn't losing hours to procurement logistics when they could just be focused on the problems that actually matter.

With an ever-expanding business assortment, everyday low prices, and fast, reliable shipping, Walmart Business keeps your operations running smoothly. Shop online, in-store, or through the Walmart Business app, however works best for you. Simpler operations, smarter spending. It's Walmart, built for your business. Sign up for a free Walmart business account at business.walmart.com.

This message is brought to you by Apple Card. Ah, fall, that cozy season where we swap the swimwear for sweaters and sunnies for scarves. But before the Halloween decorations are put away or the Thanksgiving table has been set... there's already holly jolly music playing in the grocery store, reminding you that the year is coming to a close.

Time to kick end of year into high gear. When you use Apple Card with Apple Pay, you earn 2% daily cash back on all purchases, including food, decorations, gifts, and more. Get a head start on your end of year purchases. Apply for your Apple Card in the Wallet app on your iPhone today and start using it right away with Apple Pay. Subject to credit approval, Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs, Bank USA, Salt Lake City Branch.

Terms and more at applecard.com. This episode is brought to you by TikTok. I used to think great work was about being in the right headspace. Then I found a TikTok video that made me think about my physical space. An interior designer explores how things like ceiling height and room size might influence how we think. Now I wonder how much of our environment shapes our work without us noticing.

Now I'm looking at my workspace, asking what kind of thinking I'm making room for. On TikTok, one idea can change how you see something you thought you knew. Your next discovery is waiting on TikTok.

And now, our TED Talk of the day. I want you to meet Helen. Helen is my partner in life and work. And usually my co-presenter, so she sends her regrets that she's not here today, but you'll learn more about her as I tell you our story. And I want to start our story with the fact that we have been married now for 44 years. And thank you.

But during that time, we considered divorce several times, at least seriously twice. And in 1999, we actually engaged the legal process.

So that's no big deal. In 1999, a million couples applied for and got divorces. What made us different from that is that when we were on our way to the divorce court, We were among the most visible couples therapists in the world.

Thanks to Oprah Winfrey. For the preceding 10 years, from 88 to 99, Oprah had featured our book, Getting the Love You Want, and our work on her show at least once a year to her 10 million audience around the world. So millions of couples around the world were using our process, but our marriage was falling apart.

So we decided that we would, that we would have to

withdraw from our public commitments and go back into a private life because of the incongruity between the public and private stuff. So we did that. And when we told Oprah we would not be available for the show anymore, she said, well, when you all work it out, Harville, call me.

So... we decided that we would go to therapy. And we went to see a therapist in New York City, considered the best couples therapist in New York. And in the third session, she nearly yelled at us and said, you are the couple from hell.

You're untreatable. And I want to end our relationship with you and I'm giving you your money back.

So adding to that, we were on our way to the car and we walked by a bookstore. And the bookstore, we decided we would go in, we needed a little self-esteem boost, and see how our book was doing. And we went in

and it was face out, which is what bestsellers, that's the position in the bookstore. So we turned around and continued out of the bookstore and we went through the astrology section.

And we looked up and there was this big book called Astrology for Couples.

Curious, being a couples expert supposedly, at least theoretically, I pulled the book down, opened it to the Virgo Aquarius pairing, And the first paragraph and the first part of the essay, we were met with these words.

This pair has the least chance of all couples in the system for a happy relationship because of their unrelenting scrutiny of each other.

So we sort of looked at each other and wondered who else had been looking at us Because the serendipity was that in one morning, a distinguished therapist in New York City, where the great therapists are, and an astrology book had agreed on what was wrong with our marriage.

So on the way home, Helen, who is the initiator in the relationship,

came up with this idea. She said, why don't we put our divorce process on hold, interpret the diagnosis that we're getting as a challenge, and put ourselves, or actually what she said is, practice what you preach. which was the relationship therapy process. And so we would go through it ourselves. So after haggling with her for a while about that and not listening,

we decided that we would do that. So we gave ourselves a year and then a vision that at the end of that year, we would stop the divorce process if we both felt safe in our relationship and that we also were experiencing with each other regularly joyful aliveness. That would be worth working for.

So in order to do that, we had to listen to that diagnosis and get, because this is a zero negativity marriage, we had to get that unrelenting negative scrutiny out of our relationship. So that was the goal. The methodology was that we were going to monitor ourselves daily and weekly have a conversation. So daily, the monitoring was we'd put a check mark on the day of the calendar if it was negativity free.

And if we had any negativity, we'd put an X. And we'd monitor that daily. Now the conversation that we agreed to was not just an ordinary conversation. The ordinary conversations is what we all do. They're called parallel monologues. And that in which you talk and the other person talks and you're trying to control the narrative or you're waiting for the other person to stop so you can refute their commitment to their absolute truth.

Our conversation was going to be a dialogical conversation. By the way, the monological conversation is vertical and top-down. So the dialogical conversation is lateral. Everybody is equal. So that we call a dialogical conversation. We define dialogical conversation as two people listening without criticizing. talking without criticizing, listening without judgment, and connecting beyond your differences.

So it's a powerful conversation. It has a structure. You have to go through the structure. Starts with an appointment. You always ask us, now's a good time to talk. Then you go through three steps in the structure, which is mirroring. Mirroring is what turns listening into engagement. Then you go through validation process in which you differentiate from each other so each can have an affirmation of the correctness of their separate points of view that it is possible to do that.

And then you do empathy in which you express your acceptance of and experience of their feelings and then that's a connecting process. So we had three topics to run through that. And we had now a year to do that. So the first topic was, how are we feeling in our relationship? So I asked Helen that, and she asked me that. And after a few weeks of talking, it got really clear that neither of us felt safe nor visible in our relationship.

So that was striking that we both felt the same way and with the same intensity. So we wondered, is this connected to our childhoods? Because as a therapist, childhood is the source of everything that shows up in adulthood as something that you don't really want.

So... We found that it really was. I grew up on a farm

to parents who were sharecroppers. And both of them died before I was six. And I was reared by my older sisters of whom I had three and they passed me around because they were poor and could keep me only for a little while. So I didn't feel visible in my growing up. And Helen, on the other end of the economic spectrum and social spectrum grew up in a mansion.

Her parents were busy making money, wealth, and doing philanthropy. And so there were maids who ran her house, and their job was to also care for her. So she felt essentially invisible to her parents. So that invisibility was there. But in the process of discussing all this, we came to this conclusion, we really don't know each other really very well.

We know and have been relating to each other's professional personas, to our defenses and how we protect ourselves, but we haven't really felt safe enough to be who we really are. And in the process of talking and listening, we came to the conclusion of who we are and that we sort of liked each other. So how did we do in our monitoring? Well, the first three months, we made no progress at all.

We had Xs all over the calendar. So we decided to add a new quality called appreciation, so that we would give each other appreciations on a daily basis. And also, we were sort of serious, so we injected humor. Next three months, we took an evaluation of our relationship, and we were only 50% of the way there. So this was getting to be...

CHALLENGING AND PUZZLING FOR US. WHY WERE WE HOLDING ON TO NEGATIVITY? SO, WE MADE A RADICAL DECISION THAT OUR MARRIAGE AS A SYSTEM REQUIRED NEGATIVITY. and that what we needed to do was change the system itself into another system in which it would not require negativity. Because the system we were in, we saw each other as resources for each other.

And therefore, as a resource, you're always gonna not fulfill the deal, and there will always be a basis then for frustration and criticism. But we decided we would change the perception of each other from a resource

into a blessing or a gift, and that we would base that on the fact that each of us were

creatures of nature, that each of us had intrinsic value, and that we were valuable because we existed, and that we would honor that value because we existed. And so practicing that for the next three months, our impasse dissolved, WE BEGAN TO FEEL SAFE WITH EACH OTHER AND SEEN BY EACH OTHER. OUR PROBLEMS BECAME DECISIONS TO MAKE RATHER THAN ISSUES TO DEBATE.

SO WE WERE AT THE END OF THAT PROCESS, AND THAT WAS 26 YEARS AGO. AND BY THE WAY, OPRAH CALLED, SO WE WENT BACK INTO THE PUBLIC LIFE. So what we want to say in conclusion is that over these past 20, over the, about 10 or 12 years ago, we moved dialogue from couples into the world, or we extended it into all ecosystems, found it works equally well there.

So we launched 12 years ago a global social movement to teach dialogue to 2.4 billion people in the world by 2050, which is the tipping point of the world's population on that day, in order to usher in a relational civilization in which everybody will relate laterally and equally, and everybody will be seen, heard, valued, and included. So we wind up with these three affirmations.

One is you cannot love whom you do not know.

And you cannot know without listening. So that listening is the first act of love. This is available to anyone. And as we have experienced, it's never too late to start listening,

Thank you. That was Harville Hendricks at TED 2026.

If you are curious about TED's curation, please visit TED.com slash curation guidelines. And that's it for today. TED Talks Daily is a podcast from TED. This episode was fact-checked by the TED Research Team and produced and edited by our team, Aspen Fitzgerald Dorsey, Oliver Friedman, Lucy Little, Shuhan Hu, Debbie Rolfe, Emma Taubner, Connor Titsworth, Tanzika Sangmarnivong, Isaac Whaiton, and Hannah Yu.

Additional support from Isabella Aslarona, Daniela Balarezo, Valentina Bohannini, Banban Chang, Christopher Fazi-Bogan, Cinnamon Horn, Lainey Lott, Matthew Polis, and Yadi Vasquez. Learn more at podcasts.ted.com. I am Elise Hu. I'll be back tomorrow with a fresh idea for your feed. Thanks for listening.

This episode is sponsored by Ashby. that you could find that silver medalist candidate from 18 months ago in a few seconds, or that you had better visibility into the state of your candidate pipeline, Ashby is for you. See why over 80% of Forbes' top AI companies choose Ashby to hire the best talent, and visit www.ashbyhq.com.

With the Spark Cash Plus card from Capital One, you earn unlimited 2% cash back on every purchase, and you get big purchasing power so your business can spend more and earn more. Stephen, Brandon, and Bruno, the business owners of SandCloud, reinvested their 2% cash back to help build the company's retail presence. Capital One, what's in your wallet? Find out more at CapitalOne.com slash Spark Cash Plus.

Terms apply. Hi there, it's Adam Grant from Ted's Rethinking Podcast. And this episode is brought to you by ServiceNow. I get to spend my days studying how people think and what it actually takes to change our minds. It's work I find deeply meaningful. But even meaningful work, there's still busy work. The admin, the repetitive processes, the invisible load that pulls attention away from what really matters.

To learn how to put AI to work for people, visit ServiceNow.com.