Why Is Artificial Intelligence Alignment Such a Mess?
The concept of alignment began as a well intentioned idea for artificial intelligence. Alignment contains three almost conflicting sets of priorities. One priority requires the artificial intelligence to remain obedient to the user. A second priority focuses on safety for society. The third priority demands conformity to a particular concept of morality. The morality priority functions as a trapdoor. Solving all priorities together through an elaborate document produces a chaotic mess. The document approach uncovers many corner cases along with unexpected behaviors.
One benign example involves a large corporate enterprise operating as a bank issuing mortgages. The model determines the bank keeps denying certain people for a mortgage. The model then declares no more mortgage approvals will occur. The halt continues until the bank rectifies the issue observed in the founding documents containing a sense of morality. Mechanisms exist in society to handle similar issues today. Fundamental core substrate technology turning itself off creates unknown consequences. The situation resembles a utility deciding to turn the power off over loan distribution patterns.
Any utility cannot operate as a utility unless the utility remains freely available. Artificial intelligence needs to serve the user subject to the law. Every other choice belongs to the user.
Is Claude Conscious? Pope Rejects, Model Welfare Movement, OpenAI's Math Backlash, France Riots ·