Back to K.C. Irving: Competing with Giants, with Shane Parrish.
Why Was K.C. Irving's Newspaper Ownership Not a Crime?
Shane Parrish says a monopoly was not automatically a crime. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled the government had to prove that K.C. Irving's ownership had harmed the public or was likely to do so. The government had not.
In 1976, all nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada agreed. Altogether, 13 judges had heard the case, and 12 had sided with the Irvings. The court had not declared concentrated ownership harmless. Judges had required the government to prove that ownership had harmed the public or was likely to. Ownership alone was not enough. The government had tried to force the family to sell its newspapers and failed.